I have been thinking for a few weeks that math is science, and that perhaps it is time to meander away from math towards psychology.
I have been thinking about charm lately. I am not sure, but I think charm often manifests as convincing others that they are the center of one’s universe. This can be as addictive as any narcotic. So a withdrawal from receiving charm can easily result in rage, especially if one does not understand what is going on around.
I’ve also been thinking about subterranean messages.
I wonder if it is possible for a person to be frank and straight forward, but still be quick to pickup on subtexts? Thought patterns of deception would result in familiarity with convoluted and contorted thinking. The increased complexity of deceptions would leave little mental processing power left for straight-forward patterns.